What happens when world leaders can’t agree on AI?
Matt V
February 13, 2025
AI POLICY
The UK and US have opted out of an international AI agreement signed by 60 countries at the Paris AI Action Summit.
The statement, backed by France, China, and India, promotes an "open," "inclusive," and "ethical" approach to AI, focusing on accessibility, security, and sustainability.
Why did the UK and US hold back?
The UK cited concerns over national security and the lack of clarity on global AI governance.
The US, represented by Vice President JD Vance, argued that excessive regulation could stifle AI innovation.
Vance emphasised a "pro-growth" approach, contrasting with French President Emmanuel Macron, who stressed the need for stricter rules.
What does this mean for AI policy?
The UK's decision raises questions about its AI safety commitments, given its leadership in past initiatives like the 2023 AI Safety Summit.
UKAI, a national trade body, welcomed the move, stating it allows for more flexible and pragmatic AI policies.
Despite rejecting the agreement, the UK signed separate commitments on AI sustainability and cybersecurity.
The summit also highlighted AI's rising energy consumption and ongoing trade tensions between the US and Europe.
While the UK seeks to maintain ties with both, its AI stance signals a balancing act between innovation and regulation.
Global AI agreement? More like a group project that half the class bailed on.